Talk:Martin Prince
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Definitively it's Prince(Price se pronuncia /praiz/)--AleG2 12:10, 8 April 2007 (UTC)
El verdadero nombre es "Martin Price" , no "Martin Prince" . Muchas gracias , Micalet
Anyone notice that Martin sounds alot like Penny Tompkins from the critic?
Supporting Role
editI don't think Bart the Genius would count as a supporting role. Would it? Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year! User:Sp3000 01:58, 27 December 2006 (UTC)
Character bio section removed?
editWhy was the character bio section removed, with the short description of Martin and his place in "The Simpsons" universe? You can't even tell he's a character on an animated television series anymore. The article reads like it's a real person or something. Pointless change.
Nevermind, it's back. Thank you. GCD1 13:42, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Sexual Orientation?
editI don't understand how this fits in the article. Setting aside the fact that his dance in the dutch costume wasn't specifically feminine, only one of the listed incidents even address sexual orientation at all. And even that incident was of Nelson implying that Martin was gay, and Martin saying he wasn't "anything" yet. All this confirms is that Martin's a kid who hasn't matured yet. The rest of the section talks about him being effeminate, but that's not the same thing. (And, even if it's worth keeping, it doesn't warrant its own subsection) Bladestorm 23:22, 19 June 2007 (UTC)
yes i dont see any reason why that should be there either, also, theres a proof that hes not gay in the episode "Homer night out" where bart show some porn to his classmates, martin included, and martin says that its strangly attracting or somthing like that.
This article is written in an in-universe style
editIt should be tagged as such, but I don't know how to do that. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.18.42.165 (talk) 08:24, 3 October 2007 (UTC)
Merging proposal
editNot notable, does not meet the general notability guideline (no third-party sources), entire page is merely a plot summary which is discouraged on Wikipedia. This article will be merged in a week or longer if no real objections are made and no efforts have been done to improve this article's status. Androids101 | Visit me! | talk | contribs 08:04, 12 April 2012 (UTC)
- Okay, it's been a week, and yet no-one has contested this merge - let alone improve it. This article still should not stay per my arguments above. It's just unsourced material. Androids101 | Visit me! | talk | contribs 00:01, 19 April 2012 (UTC)