| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Martine Croxall. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080907231440/http://www2.tv-ark.org.uk/presenters/c.html to http://www2.tv-ark.org.uk/presenters/c.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:58, 19 January 2018 (UTC)
Acclaim section
editThe Acclaim section is completely over the top and is the same length as the rest of the whole page. At best it reads like a poor job application and at worst a hagiography. It was probably written by the subject herself as she has a long history of narcissism. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.98.240.172 (talk) 17:16, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
- I agree that the section was over the top, though there's no need to disparage the article subject to make that point. I've merged the "Acclaim" section into the "Career" section and cut it down to a couple of sentences. You could have done the same thing yourself, though the edit would have to have been approved as the page is under pending changes protection. Best, Wham2001 (talk) 19:31, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
I was thinking about it but i didnt want a letter from her lawyers — Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.98.240.172 (talk) 14:15, 19 December 2020 (UTC)
Glee
editI've trimmed the section about Croxall being suspended. The additional quoting by User:Anvib was problematic. The original text, which Anvib dismissed as "speculation" came from the source ("It has not been made clear by Croxall or the BBC whether she was referring to Mr Johnson's withdrawal or to the fast-moving news agenda.") It was replaced by quoting more from the segment. The problem is the laughter was in response to another participant who was there to review the papers, whereas the quoting here makes it look like she's just giggling in her own gleefulness all by herself. I don't think adding even more quoting will help. It is merely 20s of TV and a blink within a long career.
Let's see how the investigation goes. This may end up being irrelevant. -- Colin°Talk 09:12, 29 October 2022 (UTC)