Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom Origins

Latest comment: 8 years ago by Wani in topic GA Review
Good articleMarvel vs. Capcom Origins has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starMarvel vs. Capcom Origins is part of the Marvel vs. Capcom series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
February 4, 2016Good article nomineeListed
May 31, 2017Good topic candidatePromoted
Current status: Good article

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Marvel vs. Capcom Origins/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 20:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


I think I'll finish this tomorrow. JAGUAR  20:43, 31 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for the wait, I'll definitely finish this tomorrow. JAGUAR  23:02, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Initial comments

edit
  • Once again, I'd recommend unlinking video game in the lead due to potential overlinkage
  • "The dual pack was released through the PlayStation Network and Xbox Live Arcade in September and October 2012." - The dual pack was released through the PlayStation Network and Xbox Live Arcade in September and October 2012, respectively.
  • "Origins was released to mixed and positive reviews" - how about The game was met with mixed to positive reviews upon release?
  • "but criticized it for its clunky, outdated gameplay and unbalanced rosters" - I'd remove 'clunky', makes it sound a bit choppy here
  • I would recommend splitting the Gameplay section into two paragraphs, to improve prose flow
  • "which had also included online play using GGPO" - unlink GGPO here, it is already linked in gameplay
  • Once more, I think it would be best to split the reception section into two paragraphs, with a new one starting at "Taylor Cocke of IGN rated the title 8.2/10..."
  • No dead refs, and they all meet WP:VG/RS

Nice work on this article, overall it's well written and comprehensive for an online-only game. Sorry for the delay too, I usually review GANs within 24 hours. Once all of the minor issues are out of the way then this can pass.   JAGUAR  16:06, 3 February 2016 (UTC)Reply