This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||
|
Plot "summary"
editThis is by no means a summary. There's too much detail. Surely the book synopsis is adequate? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 81.149.149.194 (talk) 14:55, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
Yes, this is way too big. If someone is watching this, can we please cut it down? Or drop a message on my talk page. I can do it when I get a lot of free time. ChrisMP1 (talk) 15:10, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
Rewrite
editThis article is a mess. I removed the "Plot overview" because it was a blatant violation of copyright — it was the summary off the book cover. I also removed the "Plot summary" because it was so extremely long, it looked like someone's book report (and the tag referring to that had been on since 2007). That didn't leave much. I tagged it as a stub; could someone who has read it please try to write an actual, encyclopaedic article? ChrisMP1 (talk) 01:02, 20 March 2009 (UTC)
So nothing about what the book is even about on either the article or the discussion pages? Worst Wikipedia entry ever! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.43.67.2 (talk) 22:01, 9 February 2010 (UTC)