Talk:Mary, Queen of the World Cathedral
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mary, Queen of the World Cathedral article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Weasel Words
editI've added the weasel tag in regards to the March 7, 2000 protest in the church. The paragraph, while factually correct, reads very NPOV. If somebody can fix it before I can, that would be great. Dspserpico 03:19, 9 May 2006 (UTC)
Article name
editIs the cathedral ever referred to as Mary, Queen of the World Cathedral outside Wikipedia? It seems to me the English name of it should be Marie-Reine-du-Monde Cathedral. -- Mathieugp (talk) 19:07, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
- Since Montreal is bilingual, the anglophone community definitely uses the English name. Also, the cathedral itself presents itself under this name in English to their visitors (having their leaflet in front of me while typing this).
- Jurjenb (talk) 16:48, 12 August 2013 (UTC)
National monument status
editI'm confused about the date on which it was recognized as a monument. The article states May 14, 2006, the leaflet of the cathedral mentions May 14, 2002, the website of the government (Parks Canada, Federal heritage) mentions March 28, 2000. So, what is it?
Titular/auxiliary bishops buried?
editThe titular bishops are buried on the west side and the auxiliary bishops on the east-hand side. This does not make sense. Auxiliary bishops are titular bishops. Since the text does not mention ordinaries, I must assume that that is what was meant by "titular" but since the text also does not cite a source, I am powerless to ascertain the truth of my assumption! Elizium23 (talk) 07:40, 3 July 2020 (UTC)