Talk:Mary Custis Vezey
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Vaticidalprophet in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Mary Custis Vezey appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 March 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet (talk) 19:18, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that poet Mary Custis Vezey, an eleventh-generation American, published much of her work in Russian? Source: Although I write in Russian, I am an eleventh-generation American!
Created by Madeleineog (talk). Nominated by Sdkb (talk) at 10:22, 13 February 2021 (UTC).
@Sdkb: This article is new enough and long enough. The hook facts are cited inline, the article is neutral and I detected no copyright issues. Just needs a QPQ to be done. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:16, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Cwmhiraeth: Thanks for looking it over! I wrote the hook when I came across the article, but the author, Madeleineog, is under five credits, so if they're alright with it no QPQ is needed. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 06:40, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Sdkb: Well actually, rule 5 states that it is the nominator whose DYKs should be counted. There is a backlog of over 100 nominations awaiting review! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- I understand. I've invited Madeleineog to be co-nominator, and if they accept, this can move forward. I help out where I can, but I've done quite a few reviews lately, and I'm not invested here enough to do another at this moment. {{u|Sdkb}} talk 07:05, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
- Hello both @Sdkb: @Cwmhiraeth: and thank you so much for your time on this! I'm a complete novice when it comes to DYK nominations and QPQ, but I'm happy to be a co-nominator!
- @Sdkb: Well actually, rule 5 states that it is the nominator whose DYKs should be counted. There is a backlog of over 100 nominations awaiting review! Cwmhiraeth (talk) 06:58, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
A nice article, Madeleineog. If you are co-nominator, we do not need a QPQ and I can go ahead and approve this nomination. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 10:52, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
