Talk:Mary K. Rothbart

Learn more about this page

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Psychology Mid‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Oregon Low‑importance

	Oregon portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Oregon, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Oregon on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.OregonWikipedia:WikiProject OregonTemplate:WikiProject OregonOregon articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
The current collaborations of the month are Women's History Month: Create or improve articles for women listed at Oregon Women of Achievement (modern) or Women of the West, Oregon chapter (historical).

Women scientists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women scientists, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in science on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women scientistsWikipedia:WikiProject Women scientistsTemplate:WikiProject Women scientistsWomen scientists articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Latest comment: 7 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Hi Michaela!

I really liked your lead section because you brought a lot of focus to Dr. Rothbart's personal life. I tried to find more information about Rothbart's life outside of her research, but I really struggled. I am glad that you were able to find relevant information regarding Dr. Rothbart's personal life!Alyssa.j.anderson (talk) 02:07, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Alyssa, I think this is a really good lead section. You explain the main topic, you definitely explain why the topic is important, and summarize the important points. If someone read this paragraph they would have a good overview of her research and professional career. But I also think that there should be a little more personal details included too. Such as when and where she was born. Mrocheleau13 (talk) 04:58, 27 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

Hi Courtney!

Your lead has good information, which is similar to both mine and Alyssa's which is good! I also think including the Infant Behavior Questionnaire was interesting since I didn't read anything about it. Since what all of us have are so similar for information I think our lead will be right on track to a good preview to our page. I also think it is good how concise and broad your lead is, which is what we want for a lead section.

Mrocheleau13 (talk) 21:06, 18 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Feedback

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

@Courtneyhagen, Alyssa.j.anderson, and Mrocheleau13: Nice work on your draft. A few things moving forward

You can tighten up your wording a bit. For example, you wrote

She is now retired from her teaching career, but continues to conduct research.

When you say "is now retired" you unnecessarily locate the article in a "now". Wikipedia articles aren't dated - they (hopefully) will continue to be updated and improved over the years. So rather than saying "She is now retired" say "She retired in [year] but continues..." {or "but remains active in research").

You need to include inline references. Check out the Sources and Citations training if you need a refresher on how to add sources.
Adding links to other articles helps integrate your work into Wikipedia, and makes it easy for readers to learn more about things they might want to learn more about. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 21:32, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Add topic