Talk:Maryland Route 23

Maryland Route 23 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
May 4, 2013	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / Maryland Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

Maryland

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the Maryland Roads portal in July 2016.

GA Review

Latest comment: 11 years ago8 comments2 people in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Maryland Route 23/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 05:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

It's been a couple weeks since I reviewed a GAN, hasn't it? I better change that. T C N7JM 05:48, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

In the second sentence of the RD, you use "the highway" twice. One instance of this should be substituted.
I rewrote the sentence to remove the second "the highway." I also rewrote several other sentences in the RD. V C 20:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
"MD 23 was one of the state numbered highways assigned in 1927." -- This sounds like an awkward way to state the fact that the road was designated in 1927. Is there any way you could reword this?
I tried rewording it. Let me know if it works. V C 20:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
In the auxiliary routes section, is it possible to use more specific dates for when the roads were constructed?
I put 1963 for the year and used the same year's map to reference that because that is when East–West Highway is shown as complete. V C 20:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

These are really my only gripes with this one. Great job! I'm gonna put it on hold for you to take a look at this. T C N7JM 06:03, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your review, TCN7JM. V C 20:52, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

You're very welcome. I'll

pass the article. T C N7JM 21:22, 4 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Add topic