Talk:Maryland Route 537

Maryland Route 537 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
June 11, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed

U.S. Roads: State highways / Maryland Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of the U.S. Roads WikiProject, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to state highways and other major roads in the United States. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.U.S. RoadsWikipedia:WikiProject U.S. RoadsTemplate:WikiProject U.S. RoadsU.S. road transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Topics

U.S. state highways

Locations

Maryland

This article has a map. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

This article has a junction list compliant with the Manual of Style on road junction lists.

This article has a KML file. If the file has an error, please work with the Maps department to correct it.

Article recognition:

	This article was the selected article of the Maryland Roads portal in December 2017.

GA Review

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

This review is transcluded from Talk:Maryland Route 537/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

I will be reviewing this article. Hello32020 (talk) 21:09, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Review Checklist

GA review (see here for criteria)

One of the shortest good article candidates I've seen, regardless, it appears to be comprehensive. The lead surmises the rest of the article efficiently. Both the MD 537A and D and MD 537B and C sections seem to detail their course fully and the major intersections section appears to be flawless. The history section provides a relatively detailed description for such a small highway. Additionally all of the rest of the criteria seem to be fulfilled. Good job. Hello32020 (talk) 21:32, 11 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

External links modified

Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Maryland Route 537. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080607170229/http://www.chesapeakecity.com/about.htm to http://www.chesapeakecity.com/about.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:50, 4 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

Add topic