 | Maryland Route 7 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | |||||||||
| ||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gaps
editUse line breaks (<hr>). (→zelzany - new age roads) 21:01, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Maryland Route 7/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Dr. Blofeld (talk · contribs) 11:35, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Lead
- Please state the total length of the highway in the lead
- Done. VC 23:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- I think you should state that it is the main road between Baltimore and Philadelphia.
- I elaborated that the highway was a post road between the two cities in the second paragraph. MD 7 has not been the main road between the cities in over 70 years. VC 23:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Would like to see an external link to a google map highlighting the whole collection of routes in the top right of the page like Delaware Route 5.
- I think the google map links showing each individual route are sufficient if a person wants to look at the route in more detail. The map in the infobox provides a snapshot of the whole collection. VC 23:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Route description
- You can wikilink the town names again, once in the lead and once in the article body.
- I prefer to wikilink each item only once among all prose sections of the article. Please let me know if I have been inconsistent. VC 23:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- Its a pity that you or other editors who work on road articles don't provide coordinates. It makes far more sense when you can read the description and follow it on a google map. I guess you provide a link in some of the refs but that isn't always immediately obvious to the reader..♦ Dr. Blofeld 11:51, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
- We will agree to disagree about coordinates. Thank you for the review, Dr. Blofeld. VC 23:16, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose quality:
- B. MoS compliance:
- A. Prose quality:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. References to sources:
- B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
- C. No original research:
- A. References to sources:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- B. Focused:
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
- A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
