Talk:Marylebone

Latest comment: 5 years ago by 79.66.196.140 in topic Changing External Link

Untitled

edit

Would somebody (preferable someone who lives there) give a pronunciation guide for Marylebone please? I just googled and got a variety of opinions: Mar-le-bone, Mahr-leh-bahn, Mar-lee-bone, Marrybun, maribun, Marley-bone.... I'm more confused than ever.  ;) Fabiform 18:59, 21 Jan 2004 (UTC)

'Marry-lubun (stress on first syllable). Secretlondon 19:01, Jan 21, 2004 (UTC)

Like MARRY-lubun (rhymes with Larry), MAR-ee-lubun (rhymes with Larry)? Perhaps you could write it in SAMPA? Fabiform 21:12, 21 Jan 2004 (UTC)

I'd use ["m{r\lU%b@n] (SAMPA), [ˈmæɹlʊˌbən] (IPA) with the r-sound almost silent but lengthening the preceding vowel. (Although I do live south of the river, so...)

Mar-le-bn was also common when I lived there (but I did leave nearly 30 years ago. I think the article should probably say that there were or are alternative pronunciations in reasonably common use. BenPlouviez 11:10, 11 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

The transcription does not correlate with how the man on the recording is pronouncing it. He's pronouncing it more like /ˈmɑːləbə̆ʊn/ (with /əʊ/ as a short dipthong that could make it sound just like /ə/ ) (I suppose it's best to write a transcription from the bus recordings) —Preceding unsigned comment added by 109.246.24.37 (talk) 11:32, 12 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

I don't live there, but I think the usual modern pronunciation, for example when the place is mentioned on TV, is marry-le-bone. The alternative pronunciations are traditional, and used either locally, or by upper-class individuals who like to show off their knowledge. The most extreme version I have heard is something like mar-bn. But the turnover of population, and the modern tendency to pronounce names as they are spelled, is driving out the traditional versions. It's a bit like Cirencester, which was traditionally pronounced Sissiter, but now almost always siren-sester. It's a shame to see the traditional pronunciations dying out, but probably inevitable. So long as they don't start calling Leicester Lie-sester!109.146.52.227 (talk) 15:31, 16 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

London borough

edit

The term in the article the Marylebone is a London borough is confusing. It is not one of the 33 electoral London Boroughs (is it in Camden?)

The Metropolitan Borough of St Marylebone existed until 1965 in the county of London. It is now in the City of Westminster--Henrygb 22:43, 17 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Lords

edit

The St John's Wood article also lays claim to Lord's Cricket Ground; surely it isn't in both areas? Grant65 (Talk) 14:52, Feb 27, 2005 (UTC)

Isn't lord's actually closer to Lisson Grove then St John's Wood? Simply south 10:54, 5 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Historical Information

edit

There is so little historical information on this page, do sentences like "Most of its houses are fine buildings with exquisite interiors, when put on the market now will have a price tag in excess of £10 million. It has attracted people who understand attractive buildings" really belong on a wikipedia entry? It looks like it was written by an estate agent — Preceding unsigned comment added by 194.66.229.8 (talk) 09:25, 11 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Speaking of belonging in a wiki entry: what's with all this about a "3boys1flat" and why on earth is it on here? Mildlydiscouraging (talk) 23:47, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marylebone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:11, 5 June 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Marylebone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:04, 21 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marylebone. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:10, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

The external link to the St Marylebone Society had the wrong URL (to a beta version) for their website. It has been corrected to the current website for the St Marylebone Society. 79.66.196.140 (talk) 12:19, 15 April 2019 (UTC) :15 April 2019Reply

I have also corrected the description of the external link. The SMS constitution in 1948 created the only amenity society for the whole Metropolitan Borough of St Marylebone. The Borough was subsumed into the City of Westminster in 1965. Three other amenity societies are now consulted by Westminster Council for Planning purposes within this area. Nevertheless, the Society's area of interest remains as defined in its constitution ( see www.stmarylebone.org/about.htm). 79.66.196.140 (talk) 12:51, 15 April 2019 (UTC) :15 April 2019Reply