This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Masdar City article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 2 months |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 00:23, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
Outdated article
editHere are articles that provide much more current information. As is, the Wikipedia article now reads like a PR piece.
- https://www.jstor.org/stable/26145618?seq=1 (October 2013)
- https://www.digitaltrends.com/cool-tech/masdar-green-city-adu-dhabi-failure/ (June 2016)
- https://www.fastcompany.com/3061187/a-rare-tour-of-masdar-the-failed-smart-city-in-the-arabian-desert (June 2016)
- https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2016/feb/16/masdars-zero-carbon-dream-could-become-worlds-first-green-ghost-town (February 2016)
- https://grist.org/climate-energy/the-worlds-first-zero-carbon-city-is-a-big-failure/ (February 2016)
- http://steamgreen.unibo.it/2017/03/10/masdar-city-project-criticisms-complete-failure/ (March 2017)
- https://inhabitat.com/masdars-failed-sustainable-city-may-be-doomed-to-become-a-green-ghost-town/ (February 2016)
- https://www.greenprophet.com/2018/01/masdar-city-the-ecotopia-that-never-was/ (January 2018)
- https://www.popsci.com/masdar-city-ghost-town-or-green-lab/ (April 2018)
- https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2020-02-14/the-reality-of-abu-dhabi-s-unfinished-utopia (February 2020)
- https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629619308904 (April 2020)
-- John Broughton (♫♫) 01:23, 3 November 2020 (UTC)
- I am finding the whole PR-ish feel pretty awful too, especially given how dead it looks right now on satellite (Well it's 2019 imagery, but still). I put up a missing information template instead of update because... I don't know. --Artoria2e5 🌉 17:53, 16 March 2021 (UTC)
- It is very PR-ish. This project is essentially greenwashing (for UAE + COP28) and I suspect that the people who made this article have some amount of interest in shedding the project in a positive light. I have multiple peer reviewed papers to back my claims and I intend to edit the article to bring some nuance in. FeetSupremacy (talk) 00:51, 4 November 2023 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:53, 5 June 2023 (UTC)