Talk:Maslama al-Majriti

Editors notes 19.10.2013

• The original text incorrectly includes both works in Latin translation as the Picatrix, which only refers to the second.
• In addition, it is grossly tautological and imbalanced between the two.
• Furthermore, a warning is missing that the Latin text is somewhat edited to remove references contrary to Christian dogma.
• The inconsistency in dating is probably a post-mortem edition of the author's works, a common practice when books were written by hand and an author may spend many years editing and revising his text.
• The editor is a member of the Warburg Institute's Esoterics Study Group, part of London University's Advanced Studies School, and is working at post-doctoral level.

Translations

It was a work done by the Felmish Rudolph from Brudges of the Toledo school (16th century). But it is not clear whether they were written by Maslama al-Majriti or his prudo-version. Rudolph wrote on astrolabe of Astrological-alchemical knowledge (source: The scientific dialogue linking America, Asia and Europe between the 12th and the 20thCentury, p. 437). Regards, Theologian81sp

Stop berberized everthing

He is not berber what soucre said that 41.141.136.35 (talk) 21:05, 27 January 2024 (UTC)