Talk:Mason County Sculpture Trail

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mason County Sculpture Trail/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: David Eppstein (talk · contribs) 05:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Heavily sourced to unreliable-looking promotional sources (Advantage Marketing, Miplace, Visit Ludington, and Flickr have between them, counting multiple copies, more than half of the 48 citations). Many of the other sources appear to be individual studios or other primary sources. The only ones that appear to be in any way secondary sources are puff pieces in a local newspaper.

All photos of the artworks appear to violate Commons:Commons:FOP US and I have nominated them for deletion on commons; see Commons:Commons:Deletion requests/Mason County Sculpture Trail.

As such this appears to be very far from passing both WP:GACR 2b (reliable sourcing) and 6a (appropriately licenced images). It is also problematic with respect to 1b (layout; basically one big section with a short intro) and 4 (neutrality; this appears to be a promotion for a local visitor attraction with no neutral evaluation of its more global significance as a collection of artworks).

I think it is a quick fail.

—David Eppstein (talk) 05:21, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons files used on this page or its Wikidata item have been nominated for deletion:

• Car Ferries display.JPG
• Dummy train display.JPG
• Follow the children.jpg
• Fruits of Farming display.JPG
• Hook on Hamlin sculpture.JPG
• Logging wheels with horse display.JPG

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:20, 27 October 2020 (UTC)

Mirrors

@SandyGeorgia: Saw the copyright lock here. Just an informational note: 'primidi' is a really awful WP:MIRROR; they scrape our articles and there is a machine generated attempt at attribution at the bottom of each page. It will always point to the wrong page, and the scraper tends to cut articles up by our sections. This is a sister-site of 'liquisearch', which has been around with the same broken format for at least a decade. Both sites are usually copies from around 2012 - for example see Samuel Johnson on Primidi vs. our 2012 version. No comment on the other problems you note; hope this helps. Sam Kuru (talk) 23:09, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Thanks Sam Kuru ... I will try to catch up on this tomorrow, and rejig the WP:CP entry ... most appreciated, SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:33, 25 February 2023 (UTC)

Possible copyright problem

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:39, 2 March 2023 (UTC)

See also WP:DCGAR. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 23:39, 2 March 2023 (UTC)