Talk:Mass Effect 2: Arrival/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 10:30, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   "$6.99 USD " - repetition; how about "US$ 6.99"

   "and elite human soldier " - do you mean "an"?

   "and the fact that the pack mostly consists of linear combat sequences, " - perhaps "and too many linera combat sequences" or similar. The main issue is "the fact that the"; does not flow well

   "still praiseworthy" - I would remove "still" as you only mentioned story and sequences

   " in order to progress" - could be just "to progress"

   "Unlike most of the missions, Arrival introduces a new mission " - repetition of "mission". It is a bit confusing, so suggest replacing one of the words

   "a deep cover agent" - what does "deep" mean here?

   Can you explain that Shephard "has" two genders?

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall: A few minor suggestions and issues.--Kürbis (✔) 10:32, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

   Pass/Fail:

Thank you for your review -- much appreciated. I've addressed the issues you brought up. Let me know if there's anything else. --Niwi3 (talk) 10:59, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks. Pass the article. Regards.--Kürbis (✔) 17:25, 15 September 2012 (UTC)