This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ireland, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ireland on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.IrelandWikipedia:WikiProject IrelandTemplate:WikiProject IrelandIreland articles
Mass rocks in Clontibret is within the scope of WikiProject Catholicism, an attempt to better organize and improve the quality of information in articles related to the Catholic Church. For more information, visit the project page.CatholicismWikipedia:WikiProject CatholicismTemplate:WikiProject CatholicismCatholicism articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
Latest comment: 4 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
The following discussion is closed and will soon be archived:Outcome was: merge completed
To at least partially address the context issue (long since tagged on Mass rocks in Clontibret) and the notability issue (more recently tagged on Lisglasson Mass Garden) I propose to merge the two. Almost all of the WP:MERGEREASONs are met. In that, as per the longstanding tag, a reader of the Mass rocks in Clontibret article needs to also read the Lisglasson Mass Garden article (and probably others besides) to fully understand the subject. Which shouldn't be neccessary. Otherwise both articles have been very short for a very long time (with no realistic chance of expansion in a way that doesn't result in CFORKs). And they both effectively cover the same topic. A merge might at least address some of the concerns highlighted with both articles. If not other thoughts, I'm going to merge the short "garden" article here. And then attempt to improve the merged article. Guliolopez (talk) 00:06, 30 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
Resolved It's been a while. I haven't heard any other thoughts. And so I went ahead with the merge. As noted, there wasn't much to merge (as most of the content was already here anyway). Guliolopez (talk) 20:19, 4 September 2020 (UTC)