Talk:Massachusetts Route 25
Latest comment: 15 years ago by Dough4872 in topic GA Review
Massachusetts Route 25 has been listed as one of the Engineering and technology good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
edit- This review is transcluded from Talk:Massachusetts Route 25/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Comments:
- "limited-access freeway" sounds wordy, "freeway" would simply suffice here.
- Done -- Rai•me 01:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- "passing close to several farms and cranberry bogs in Wareham and passing under Charge Pond Road." sounds a little awkward.
- Reworded to "passing close to several farms and cranberry bogs in Wareham. After passing under Charge Pond Road, ..." -- Rai•me 01:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Was the Cape Cod Expressway really supposed to continue all the way to New York City?
- Yes, the expressway would have utilized different freeway alignments from Cape Cod to New York (presumably modern I-95, I-195, and MA 25) -- Rai•me 01:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- The traffic count would fit better at the end of the Route description than in the History section.
- I don't see how it would fit in with the Route description section; stating how many motorists used the road in 2008 seems more like a historical fact. Where do you think the traffic count should be in the section? It is too short to be separate paragraph. -- Rai•me 01:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Tack it on to the last sentence of the route description. Several other articles, such as Maryland Route 355 and Washington State Route 532, have the traffic counts in the route description. Dough4872 (talk) 01:20, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- Done -- Rai•me 01:29, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
I am placing the article on hold. Dough4872 (talk) 00:55, 21 August 2009 (UTC) Thanks for the review and cheers, Rai•me 01:16, 21 August 2009 (UTC)
- I will now pass the article. Dough4872 (talk) 01:31, 21 August 2009 (UTC)