Talk:Massive gravity
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
.jpg){kind=small}
Lorentz violating massive gravity
editHello, I noticed that the page doesn't mention Lorentz violating massive gravity. I think it would be interesting to have a section about it. Yet, it is a relatively wide subject, so comments and contributions would be welcome. Thank you-Cosmichaloe (talk) 10:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
May be unclear
editThe article says " gravitational waves obey a massive wave equation ". This is unclear upon first reading. It sounds like it is a massive "wave equation", but isn't it actually a wave equation for massive particles? As it is written, "massive" is an adjective of "equation". Bubba73 You talkin' to me? 04:17, 26 January 2020 (UTC)
While I'm glad that someone decided to share the lit review from their PHD thesis, this article is vastly too technical for an encyclopedia entry
editPlease dumb it down for the rest of us. Gsm54321 (talk) 04:15, 15 April 2024 (UTC)
Suggested addition of the work of Gambuti and Maggiore
editThis work by Gambuti and Maggiore https://arxiv.org/abs/2102.10813 makes what I believe is an important contribution to the subject. (BTW I am a layperson, a mechanical engineer). The work presents a linearized massive gravity theory that is free of the vDVZ discontinuity of the classical Fierz-Pauli linearized theory (which founded the subject). Without the Gambuti and Maggiore (GM) work, one might believe that it is necessary to introduce non-linearity to resolve the vDVZ discontinuity Love equation (talk) 06:23, 22 August 2024 (UTC)