Talk:Master Grossmith

Latest comment: 4 years ago by Blythwood in topic Feedback from New Page Review process

Feedback from New Page Review process

edit

I left the following feedback for the creator/future reviewers while reviewing this article: Pretty solid. Few tuneups I've made: as both books have been digitised, I've linked to them. I'm presuming William Robert was his genuine name, and 'Master' just a stage name, so I've put his real name first and "also known as" second, and also put in a redirect from "William Robert Grossmith". There's a BBC article (unfortunately unsigned) discussing a theatre poster of his, so I've cited it. It's best to check articles before publishing, and there were a few mistakes. You had "Goldsmith" instead of Grossmith a few times (which really gave me the heebie-jeebies that the article had got two different people mixed up–please try not to give new page reviewers heart attacks in future!) and it's best to link to the play not the person for Richard III. I see one book and the BBC source both say George Grossmith was his nephew? Might make sense to add that if so. And added a few categories, and put the book title in italics. Hope that all makes sense!.

Blythwood (talk) 17:42, 31 December 2019 (UTC)Reply