 | Mastermind (song) has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | Mastermind (song) is part of the Midnights series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | On 11 November 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved from Mastermind (Taylor Swift song) to Mastermind (song). The result of the discussion was moved. |
Requested move 11 November 2022
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The result of the move request was: moved. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 20:00, 18 November 2022 (UTC)
Mastermind (Taylor Swift song) → Mastermind (song) – No other song of the title "Mastermind" has a Wikipedia article. aaronneallucas (talk) 17:52, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:07, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Shwcz (talk) 21:28, 11 November 2022 (UTC)
- Mastermind (disambiguation) In ictu oculi (talk) 18:22, 12 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support nothing else to add as the nom's rationale says enough. Your Power 🐍 💬 "What did I tell you?"
📝 "Don't get complacent..." 06:24, 13 November 2022 (UTC) - Support - As none of the other songs named "Mastermind" have been deemed notable enough to have an article created.--NØ 18:55, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support unless others are notable. Crouch, Swale (talk) 19:25, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
- Support per nom. Aoba47 (talk) 20:37, 13 November 2022 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
GA Review
editThe following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Mastermind (song)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 15:43, 4 January 2024 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it well written?
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
- A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
- Is it verifiable with no original research?
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):
- C. It contains no original research:
- D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
- A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
- A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
- Is it neutral?
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
- Is it stable?
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
- Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Could you add an image to either the background or lyrics section?
- B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Pass or Fail:
Suggestions for improvement below:
- Refs: the only ref that concerns me and should be replaced is ref 35
- Background: "Swift wrote and produced "Mastermind" alongside eight songs with Antonoff, who also co-wrote all of them" should be rewritten
- Lyrics, first paragraph: [14][15][16][17],[9][19][20][21], remove/fix/seperate per WP:CITEKILL
- @Cherrell410: Thanks for the review. I have addressed all points accordingly. Ref #35 is self-published via Facebook by the Recording Industry Association of Malaysia so it should satisfy WP:SELFPUB. Cheers, Ippantekina (talk) 02:52, 9 January 2024 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.