Talk:Matal v. Tam
Latest comment: 7 years ago by MZMcBride in topic Requested move 19 June 2017
 | This article follows the Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Legal. It uses the Bluebook legal referencing style. This citation style uses standardized abbreviations, such as "N.Y. Times" for The New York Times. Please review those standards before making style or formatting changes. Information on this referencing style may be obtained at: Cornell's Basic Legal Citation site. |
 | This article is written in American English, which has its own spelling conventions (color, defense, traveled) and some terms that are used in it may be different or absent from other varieties of English. According to the relevant style guide, this should not be changed without broad consensus. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Requested move 19 June 2017
edit{{requested move/dated|Matal v. Tam}}
In Re Tam → Matal v. Tam – SCOTUS case name should take priority as the nationwide precedent ResultingConstant (talk) 20:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
- Support as nom ResultingConstant (talk) 20:41, 19 June 2017 (UTC)
Moved. --MZMcBride (talk) 21:38, 19 June 2017 (UTC)