Talk:Mathew Thorpe
| This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Untitled
editI notice this article is not consistent with the year in case citations, sometimes putting it in square brackets and sometimes normal brackets. Usual practice is square brackets, no? 80.168.173.136 (talk) 16:13, 28 January 2008 (UTC)
Lambert divorce case in 2002
editUnmentioned in this article is that Lord Justice Thorpe presided over the appeal against the divorce settlement between Harry and Shan Lambert. In an FT article on the divorce of Sir Martin Sorrell:
Sir Martin, the founder of the WPP advertising empire, has been ordered to pay his ex-wife Sandra a settlement worth almost £30m, one of the biggest in English legal history. But lawyers said the High Court ruling was a victory for Sir Martin as he managed to secure about 60 per cent of the couple's assets. Judges have been increasingly inclined to give wives increased settlements and there has been a legal presumption of a 50–50 asset split.
It is the first time a judge has decided against an even split in a big-money case since an influential ruling in 2002 in effect gave equality to non-working wives.
...
It was the divorce case of newspaper tycoon Harry Lambert that established that the courts should rate the homemaker's role equal to the breadwinner's in deciding settlements. Shan Lambert was awarded half of the family's £20m fortune — which derived from Adscene, a company publishing free newspapers set up by her husband when she appealed against an initial £7.5m award. Before that, husbands had successfully argued that their "stellar" business performances entitled them to more than a half share.
In the Lambert judgment, Lord Justice Thorpe left only the slimmest chance of unequal shares, saying: "Special contribution remains a legitimate possibility but only in exceptional circumstances."
— Sherwood, Bob (25 October 2005). "Sorrell breaks trend in divorce settlement". Financial Times. Retrieved 21 December 2015.
Given this is a principle in the divorce law of England and Wales, it should certainly be included here. — OwenBlacker (Talk) 14:08, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mathew Thorpe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20151208131624/https://www.policespecials.com/forum/index.php/topic/126010-lord-chancellor-chides-thorpe-lj-over-driving-ban/ to https://www.policespecials.com/forum/index.php/topic/126010-lord-chancellor-chides-thorpe-lj-over-driving-ban/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:03, 20 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Mathew Thorpe. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121022130622/http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/about-the-judiciary/judges-magistrates-and-tribunal-judges/biographies/lj-thorpe-biography to http://www.judiciary.gov.uk/about-the-judiciary/judges-magistrates-and-tribunal-judges/biographies/lj-thorpe-biography
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:18, 21 January 2018 (UTC)