This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Drug Policy, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Drug PolicyWikipedia:WikiProject Drug PolicyTemplate:WikiProject Drug PolicyDrug Policy articles
Latest comment: 1 year ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I've already had to remove a good three sources for being improperly sourced. Almost every source that is actually about this guy relies on interviews with him or are studies by him. The University of Victoria source is also questionable as it relies on his claims alone. Honestly, most of the sources on his involvement in drug production are questionable. This article needs to have its sources looked at more, I really don't think the sources are suitable, they barely count as secondary sources and the ones that do count are made by him. If his claims turn out to be unverifiable, I'd recommend deleting the article. Clubspike2 (talk) 09:39, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
One of the sources you removed was dead but had an archive available. Another required a login to show the relevant content. Neither issue invalidates the source, so I have restored them with an archive and a subscription tag.-gadfium18:35, 14 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
