Talk:Matt Dallas/Archive 1
 | This is an archive of past discussions about Matt Dallas. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 |
Cite source
If Matt Dallas was on a Charmed episode, please give a source. I looked on the IMDb website and I couldn't find it. --66.218.19.137 02:16, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
To my knowledge, Matt Dallas was never on a Charmed episode. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Parrotletlover (talk • contribs)
Sexuality
Will someone please stop deleting the gay controversies that so many media outlets have talked about. Im sorry if some little girl has a major crush on him and keeps deleting it... but the couple had been spotted and photographed out together many times and I provided sources!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.228.153 (talk) 17:02, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
- You have only provided gossip. It doesn't matter if he is gay or not, anyways. It isn't what makes him notable. We are not a tabloid. BOVINEBOY2008 :) 17:06, 30 December 2009 (UTC)
Gossip is exactly what it is to treat someone as though they are a couple just because they are friends, hanging around together or go to events together with one another does not constitute a gay couple. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.126.144.65 (talk) 14:52, 22 April 2010 (UTC) It is also considered a form of descrimination when an assumption is made someone is gay because of a mere photograph, and you have not provided proper verbal proof of both individuals stating they are gay. FAIR USE RATIONALE: Your links of proof take you no where on the internet except to Wikipedia again and no photo to be seen, etc. I question how correct the information is on this website, especially when so many people out there use this information to compile reports, for work, college reports or thesis, and grammar school reports and you have inadequate proof of information entered by just anyone without signing in. Also once you enter the information it doesn't appear to be removeable, although you give the impression that you are allowed to delete improper information. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 97.126.144.65 (talk) 18:27, 23 April 2010 (UTC)
Well, recent events certainly make these objections seem sillier and more homophobic all the time, don't they? It's true that someone's sexuality isn't or shouldn't be what makes them notable, but the reaction in here to what was only gossip to those who refused to believe what was already well-known and a matter of public record is nothing to be proud of. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.196.224.126 (talk) 05:12, 8 January 2013 (UTC)