Talk:Matt Finish
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
Matt Finish edits, May 2012
editBack in April 2012 I made a number of edits to Matt Finish see here. In the following month User:Onedaysoon deleted much of this material in two edits: 1 and 2. The user provided the edit summary Revert to previous version before Shaidar cuebiyar edited. Note: if he edits this page again, report and request ban from contributing.
I see no justification for these edits on this talkpage. I edited Matt Finish today and noticed the wholesale removal of my work without any clear explanation. Note that the threat if he edits this page again, report and request ban from contributing constitutes a form of harassment. Could User:Onedaysoon provide a reasoned discussion for the above removals of my material from Matt Finish on this talkpage? I have placed a request on the user's talkpage to do so.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 01:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC)
- Its now over five months since I made the above request. User:Onedaysoon has not explained the earlier deletion of material from this article nor threats made against me. I have returned much of the material which had been deleted. I may have inadvertently deleted material from other editors for which I apologise.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 03:24, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- I don't see anything objectionable about the material you've reinstated. The article provides fairly comprehensive coverage of the band and its history, but the breakout articles for the albums could certainly do with some work to add detail, bring them into Wikipedia style and add some sourcing to ensure they don't get deleted. User:Onedaysoon seems to have ceased editing at Wikipedia. BlackCab (talk) 05:12, 10 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks for your comments. I'm not sure of User:Onedaysoon's status: there are often long gaps between editing phases and may be on hiatus. As for the album articles I'm busy tidying up others and may not get to them for quite some time.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 23:37, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
- I have some of them. I should do it myself. BlackCab (talk) 23:46, 12 March 2014 (UTC)
May 2014 edits
editAn anonymous editor, User:124.168.135.49, removed/replaced much of the material in this article in mid-May, returning it to a similar form as the above edits. See article history. These are the only four edits by this account. I reverted them, and other edits, to a version I believe to be acceptable. Once again I apologise if I've inadvertently removed material by other editors which may have improved the article.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 19:18, 4 June 2014 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Matt Finish/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Comment(s) | Press [show] to view → |
---|---|
Re article rating:
The article references several sources, and there is coverage of a variety of critical responses. Since the band is reforming, the band seems to be part of the current music scene. (above comments are unsigned and not by undersigned) Re-assessment
Re-assessment
|
Last edited at 22:15, 6 April 2009 (UTC). Substituted at 23:26, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Matt Finish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.whammo.com.au/encyclopedia.asp?articleid=471
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080319094215/http://hem.passagen.se/honga/database/m/moffittmatt.html to http://hem.passagen.se/honga/database/m/moffittmatt.html
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.whammo.com.au/index.asp
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:00, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Matt Finish. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110219100634/http://www.australiancollector.com/aus/var.htm to http://www.australiancollector.com/aus/var.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091018040956/http://www.undercover.com.au/News-Story.aspx?id=3777 to http://www.undercover.com.au/News-Story.aspx?id=3777
- Added archive https://archive.is/20121230101225/http://www.hotsource.com.au/news/1086/Matt_Finish_new_EP_New_Frontier to http://www.hotsource.com.au/news/1086/Matt_Finish_new_EP_New_Frontier
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:43, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
September 2018 restoration of deleted material
editI have returned much of the material deleted by @106.69.205.163: during June 2018. This includes similar content, which was deleted, in 2012 by @Onedaysoon: and in 2014 by @124.168.135.49: please discuss these issues here before removing this work.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 22:36, 12 September 2018 (UTC)
September 2021 restoration of deleted material
editI have returned material deleted by @14.200.107.11: in September 2021. This includes similar content, which was deleted, in 2012 by @Onedaysoon:, in 2014 by @124.168.135.49: and in 2018 by @106.69.205.163:. Could you please discuss these issues here to reach a consensus?shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 11:31, 8 September 2021 (UTC)
I am Onedaysoon. I formed the band Matt Finnish in 1989 and started this page about my band. Someone keeps editing this page incorrectly adding unverifiable data regarding a different band called Matt Finnish. Please stop changing this page.
- Comment: the above statement was added by @14.200.107.11: on 9 September 2021 per diff.
- Reply: you claim to be User:Onedaysoon and to have started this WP article. You also claim to have formed Matt Finnish [sic] in 1989. Neither of these establishes your ownership of content. Other editors have as much right to add/modify content as you. Where disputes arise between editors they should discuss their issues and so try to reach a consensus. You have not made any such attempt. If you read this talk page you can see that I have attempted to do so since May 2012.
- According to earlier content: Matt Finnish were started in 1988 by Matt Moffitt, Brian Alcorn and Tony Georgeson. Matt Finish were started by Moffitt, Alcorn and John Prior.
- This article was started in July 2006 by User:Breto not User:Onedaysoon. The latter's first edit at this article was in April 2009 (see here).
- If you are/were a member of Matt Finish then you should have declared your Conflict of Interest when you edited this (and related) articles. That's at least 12 years ago.
- Your recent edit summaries claim "minor edit" or "minor" when clearly the content being added has previously been disputed. These are not minor edits and using that terminology is deceptive.
- User:Onedaysoon threatened me with "if he edits this page again, report and request ban from contributing" back in April 2012.
- User:14.200.107.11 wrote "Restoring page from hacks referring to unverifiable Matt Finnish (different to Matt Finish, maybe warrants its own page but not relevant here)." in their edit summary, yesterday. How is this conducive to a rational discussion of the issues you have with this article? I object to my edits being referred to as hacks.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:06, 10 September 2021 (UTC)04:25, 10 September 2021 (UTC)
- I've waited a reasonable time for a response from the above editor(s) but none has been provided. I will now revert the article to its earlier form.shaidar cuebiyar (talk) 04:07, 23 September 2021 (UTC)