Talk:Matteo I Visconti/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Lingzhi2 (talk · contribs) 12:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

• You've been waiting a while. I'll review this... I think you need to follow the advice at User:Lingzhi2/reviewsourcecheck, however. I see 9 Harv errors and many others of other kinds (some are less important than others). ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 12:01, 14 September 2019 (UTC)

I reverted the article back to the last edit by LouisAragon. It appears that edits by another editor caused the Harv errors. Please let me know if I have caught everything and what to do next.--Kansas Bear (talk) 05:46, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

@Kansas Bear: Unfortunately I'm not sure that such a large reversion was the best way to address these problems. May I revert back and take a look at the issues? ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 11:43, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Sure. --Kansas Bear (talk) 15:53, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

I have restored the article. --Kansas Bear (talk) 18:51, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

@Kansas Bear: Would you please describe what you meant by "the Harv errors"? I am looking at the 2019-05-17T23:23:11 version & I do not see the Mediawiki software flagging any of the references or Harvard citations as errors. I am typically using Chrome & Firefox on Windows 10 & Chrome on IOS.

Perhaps you were referring to my unconventional practice of including a URL as an external web link to page numbers that I did with this edit, in which case we are discussing a difference in style.

Peaceray (talk) 19:32, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

From Lingzhi2's first paragraph, "I think you need to follow the advice at User:Lingzhi2/reviewsourcecheck." --Kansas Bear (talk) 20:14, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Oh! Cool, I’ll add that to my .js & .css pages when I get home this evening. That will be particularly useful since I have been converting a bunch of articles to Harv referencing this year. Peaceray (talk) 20:33, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

(←) Excellent. This went smoothly. Good work. If you have questions about any errors etc., ping me. I'll look at this again somtime sonn anyhow too, ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 23:12, 17 September 2019 (UTC)

Hey, I took care of the Harv warnings thanks to User:Lingzhi2/reviewsourcecheck. Peaceray (talk) 04:28, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

My sincerest thanks. --Kansas Bear (talk) 06:05, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

• Hey I've been doing some spot-checks and... well, yeah, I didn't see paraphrase that was close enough to alarm me... I'm Leaning Pass but see seven Caution: Missing pagenums for book chapter? warnings. You can usually get these by copy/pasting the title of the chapter (not the book) into Google Scholar and clicking on the little blue double quotes that are beside a little blue star just below the descriptive text. Just make sure the year, publisher etc are the same as the edition in your bibliography... I did the first one for you. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 14:35, 18 September 2019 (UTC)

• Did I catch all the book chapter errors, Lingzhi2? --Kansas Bear (talk) 23:34, 19 September 2019 (UTC)

• I believe this article meets the requirements of WP:WIAGA. Pass GAN. ♦ Lingzhi2 (talk) 05:14, 20 September 2019 (UTC)