This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject English Royalty. For more information, visit the project page.English RoyaltyWikipedia:WikiProject English RoyaltyTemplate:WikiProject English RoyaltyEnglish royalty articles
Latest comment: 14 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
According to this article and that of Philip, Matthew was 13 years elder than Philip, but in the article of their father Thierry, Philip ranks the first, and in history, it was actually Philip who succeeded Thierry, not Matthew. As they were both legitimate, if Matthew was elder, he should be the eldest son of Thierry and become the successor. What is more, Thierry married their mother Sibylla in 1139, and the first wife of Thierry (Suanhilde) died in 1132, how could Matthew be born in 1130 by Sibylla? Versions of other languages refer that Matthew was born in 1137, but for the sakes above, it is also doubtful.——Heinrich ⅩⅦ von Bayern (talk) 03:19, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Reply
