This article was nominated for deletion on 11 April 2014 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
The following Wikipedia contributors may be personally or professionally connected to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I have added a conflict of interest tag. The author was originally named Matthewchristopher and renamed to Flubbadubba1956. The have stated they are not Matthew Christopher but they obviously have a conflict of interest. They uploaded MC picture.png and Sophia by Matthew Christopher.jpg claiming to be the author and copyright holder of both images. They are the only significant author and this need to be seriously evaluated for neutrality. GBfan23:13, 10 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
I removed the copyvio images and most of the unsourced content. I also removed the tag as with the offending content removed it seems to be resolved. Naturally, feel free to restore if you think it is still needed. VQuakr (talk) 04:25, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I see some wedding announcements in major publications, including Out[1] and The New York Times[2]. The NYT article includes a bit of a bio. The Ames Tribune has a bio as well. Then, of course, there are about a million websites selling his dresses (none of which, naturally, meet our requirements for sourcing. Overall, I think the article would likely survive a deletion discussion, but not by a wide margin. I am not inclined to nominate it at this time. GB fan, what are your thoughts? VQuakr (talk) 04:25, 11 April 2014 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 8 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
Just like above, we have a user named Matthewchristopher who is renamed, this time to Vermontmountainboy. Again, an image with questionable copyright has been uploaded to commons: File:Head shot of US couture designer Matthew Christopher IMG 7443 2 MB.JPG. I've flagged that image for speedy deletion, as it appears to have been taken from a NY Post article which attributes it to photographer Rafael Astorga with no indication of a compatible license. This, combined with the use of some very flimsy sources suggests that this should be resolved before the tag is removed, but that shouldn't be too hard. Grayfell (talk) 01:53, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
I've cleaned up the article to where I no longer see any COI or major sourcing problems, so I've removed the templates. The image copyright issues will have to be resolved for it to be restored, however. Grayfell (talk) 02:34, 1 February 2016 (UTC)Reply
