This article was nominated for deletion on 16 October 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus.
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourcedmust be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Photography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of photography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PhotographyWikipedia:WikiProject PhotographyTemplate:WikiProject PhotographyPhotography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Portugal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Portugal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PortugalWikipedia:WikiProject PortugalTemplate:WikiProject PortugalPortugal articles
Find correct name
The airport is not listed as João Paulo II anywhere.
The airport's own website calls itself simply Ponta Delgada, and has no mention of João Paulo.
Template:Regions of Portugal: statistical (NUTS3) subregions and intercommunal entities are confused; they are not the same in all regions, and should be sublisted separately in each region: intermunicipal entities are sometimes larger and split by subregions (e.g. the Metropolitan Area of Lisbon has two subregions), some intercommunal entities are containing only parts of subregions. All subregions should be listed explicitly and not assume they are only intermunicipal entities (which accessorily are not statistic subdivisions but real administrative entities, so they should be listed below, probably using a smaller font: we can safely eliminate the subgrouping by type of intermunicipal entity from this box).
Latest comment: 7 years ago4 comments3 people in discussion
This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because Maurício Abreu is a leading, renowned name in Portuguese photography. I think this was added by simply bad faith, since the person who decided to do so seems to don`t know anything about him. There are plenty of sources that we can use to assure his importance. Among other notable works he was the photographer of José Saramago travel book Viagem a Portugal (1990). --Mistico (talk) 15:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
I don't know anything about him. but don't assume it's bad faith. There needs to be a review as to whether the individual is notable. Leave the heading there until that's settled. Contaldo80 (talk) 13:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
@Mistico: This could really do with more reliable sources. As a "renowned" photographer, it should be possible to find more sourcing. And no, it is reckless to accuse a new page patroler of bad faith because he tags an article for CSD. They review many, many articles.Dlohcierekim (talk) 20:28, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 7 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
I looked at the article on the Portuguese site. It has only one reference - the website http://www.mauricioabreu.com It worries me that this is not impartial. This article still looks dodgy to me. On what grounds Ritchie333 are you satisfied it is fine? Contaldo80 (talk) 11:16, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
The Portuguese Wikipédia article about Maurício Abreu now lists three RS. So, its a case closed about this present article importance.Mistico (talk) 17:12, 13 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
No, the portuguese sources are a disgrace. Two of them are book selling websites and I can't even locate the subject on the other one. This is just not good enough. Contaldo80 (talk) 08:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)Reply
