Talk:Maurizio Prato (scientist)
Latest comment: 8 years ago by Krishna Chaitanya Velaga in topic Requested move 11 October 2016
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 11 October 2016
edit- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: not moved. (non-admin closure) Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 11:58, 18 October 2016 (UTC)
Maurizio Prato (scientist) → Maurizio Prato – current Maurizio Prato page is about a businessman and has very little information. Maurizio Prato (scientist) is properly cited and has more relevant and updated content. – Carloprato (talk) 06:35, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 10:23, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Carloprato and In ictu oculi: This will require a RM. In ictu oculi (talk) 07:54, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Apart from the author's COI issues, there's a lack of independent references on the MP(s) article. They're all papers BY the subject, there's nothing ABOUT the subject. The article may still (though unlikely) fail WP:N. There's nothing to show one of the MPs may be more notable than the other. Perhaps a dab page is merited, but not worthy of a usurpation of the article name. Cabayi (talk) 10:56, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose verbatim as Cabayi In ictu oculi (talk) 12:56, 11 October 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.