 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
.svg){kind=logo}
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view. |
External links modified (January 2018)
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Max Kelly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070217030315/http://www.maxkelly.com.au/main.php to http://www.maxkelly.com.au/main.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:44, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
What connection?
editMax Kelly died in 2007. So what is the problematic "personal or professional connection" that, in a banner, a senior editor asserts I may have with Kelly? In this case, I think clarity on what is rather officially considered problematic would be of value. Thank you. KHarbaugh (talk) 11:27, 21 December 2020 (UTC)
- @KHarbaugh: The message on your talk page is a request for you to review WP:COI if you have a conflict of interest with Max Kelly or Ross Street in any way. I am not asserting that you have a conflict of interest, but it appears very plausible from an external perspective given your editing behavior in focusing largely on those two biographies for 6 years and adding an extraordinary level of detail (more than even a typical mathematical collaborator would have) on their work.A conflict of interest is not
problematic
, but there are strong guidelines on how to deal with a conflict of interest on Wikipedia. If you can disclose your relationship with either person (see WP:DISCLOSE for how), that would make handling the potential conflicts of interest easier. — MarkH21talk 13:31, 21 December 2020 (UTC)- Also worth noting: it is extraordinarily rare for an academic biography on Wikipedia to list more than a handful of papers, carefully chosen to be the most significant of the subject's career. Wikipedia is not a platform for hosting CVs. XOR'easter (talk) 20:44, 21 December 2020 (UTC)