Talk:Max Magnus Norman
This article was nominated for deletion on 29 January 2009 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI advice the notability tag to be removed, Max Magnus Norman might keep a low profile in the "major" art world but among other things the art and projects released by this artist has had an impact which deserves attention (and some third part explanations). —Preceding unsigned comment added by 87.251.215.91 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 26 January 2008
- I agree. Removing tag and adding third party sources. --Bensin (talk) 02:26, 28 October 2008 (UTC)
PROD tag added
editFolks, the guy even boasts that he has merely spammed his way across the internet. Do a google for him and read some of the results. He's below the art radar as a "major" artist because he is not a major artist and does not warrant a Wiki article. Setwisohi (talk) 16:37, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
Who boasts what? This discussion has already been held, if following your advice half of wikipedia ought to be deleted. /H —Preceding unsigned comment added by Highbrowser (talk • contribs) 19:20, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
- I see no sign that this discussion has already been held. But, in any case, I have put the article to AfD - Wiki consensus is the best way to decide. If/When an article clears AfD then there can no longer be any dispute. Setwisohi (talk) 21:07, 29 January 2009 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 4 external links on Max Magnus Norman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110718192807/http://www.st.nu/nyheter/lokalt.php?action=visa_artikel&id=596555 to http://www.st.nu/nyheter/lokalt.php?action=visa_artikel&id=596555
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110718192816/http://www.st.nu/noje/index.php?action=visa_artikel&id=660897 to http://www.st.nu/noje/index.php?action=visa_artikel&id=660897
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20080702004943/http://www.st.nu:80/noje/kultur.php?action=visa_artikel&id=742250 to http://www.st.nu/noje/kultur.php?action=visa_artikel&id=742250
- Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110718192751/http://www.st.nu/nyheter/lokalt.php?action=visa_artikel&id=672748 to http://www.st.nu/nyheter/lokalt.php?action=visa_artikel&id=672748
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:02, 28 February 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Max Magnus Norman. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090513133201/http://st.nu/kultur/1.1025190 to http://st.nu/kultur/1.1025190
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130418103647/http://allehanda.se/mer/kultur/1.187839 to http://allehanda.se/mer/kultur/1.187839
- Added archive https://archive.is/20130418092805/http://dagbladet.se/kulturnoje/1.58785 to http://dagbladet.se/kulturnoje/1.58785
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080922060312/http://dagbladet.se/kulturnoje/1.105128 to http://dagbladet.se/kulturnoje/1.105128
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080804141224/http://dagbladet.se/kulturnoje/1.78878 to http://dagbladet.se/kulturnoje/1.78878
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:59, 4 September 2017 (UTC)