Talk:Max Sievers

Latest comment: 6 years ago by InternetArchiveBot in topic External links modified

Untitled

edit

This article does not meet independent standards. There is some comment in the article, and the latter looks like a polemic against Marxism. 203.143.160.69 (talk) 05:27, 18 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

I think you need to spell out which bits of the entry you don't like. Otherwise your unsubstantiated comment here simply seems to have acted, so far for four years, to discourage anyone from adding anything substantive to the entry while they wait to see how the problem you have identified will be resolved. And of course the problem cannot be resolved because, except in the most general terms, you have not bothered to tell us what it is. Please do so. Better still, add a couple of lines from your own sources that provide a balancing perspective that will cure the issue that you say you have identified. Success Charles01 (talk) 19:49, 15 April 2015 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Max Sievers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:57, 5 December 2017 (UTC)Reply