Talk:Maxim Lapierre/GA1
Latest comment: 13 years ago by Leech44 in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 16:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
I've done a quick read of the article and checked for dead links. Everything is looking very good so far. I'm going to spot check some of the references and do a double check of grammar, but this article will probably be a quick pass.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 16:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- no dead links spot checks of refs provided accuracy
- a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- a (major aspects): b (focused):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- All images contain proper licensing. The two images from flickr have been verified.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
I didn't find any major issues with this article so I've gone ahead and passed this. Great work.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 00:59, 23 May 2011 (UTC)