Talk:Maxim Lapierre/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 16:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

I've done a quick read of the article and checked for dead links. Everything is looking very good so far. I'm going to spot check some of the references and do a double check of grammar, but this article will probably be a quick pass.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 16:00, 22 May 2011 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Changed game-winner to game-winning goal more clarification for people who may not be familiar ice hockey. It also sounded more encyclopedic to me.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   no dead links spot checks of refs provided accuracy

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   All images contain proper licensing. The two images from flickr have been verified.

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

I didn't find any major issues with this article so I've gone ahead and passed this. Great work.--Mo Rock...Monstrous (leech44) 00:59, 23 May 2011 (UTC)