Talk:Maximum Homerdrive/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Ruby2010 comment! 14:14, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

I will review soon. Ruby2010 comment! 14:14, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Comments

• Wikilink publishers in ref section (the ones that have their own articles)
• Wikilink characters in plot section (including Simpsons family)
• "Back in Springfield, Marge's attempt to cut the wires to the doorbell fails since Homer traded their tools for confectionery and pulls out the wire which instead plays faster and louder, causing the neighborhood to be disturbed by the noise." I see what you're trying to say, but it's a long sentence verging on a run-on. Try rewriting
• Wikilink Jehova's witnesses in production section
• Make sure sentences with quotes end with citations

Just a few minor issuses above, and the article will be good to go! Ruby2010 comment! 15:10, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Thanks for another great review! :) Queenieacoustic (talk) 17:41, 27 June 2011 (UTC)

Pass for GA. Nice work! Ruby2010 comment! 18:35, 27 June 2011 (UTC)