Talk:May Bukas Pa (2009 TV series)

Social Worker portrayal

We would like to violently react on the role of the SOCIAL WORKER in this show. We are an avid televiewer of your show and we have observed that the role of the Social Worker in your show is totally opposite in what we actually perform in a real practice. We feel that our profession is being degraded. In reality, the role of the social worker is a mediator for the best interest of our client. We strongly believe on our principles and work ethics. Maybe you can consult the Social Workers employed in your own foundation "BANTAY BATA". We are the group of Social Workers working in a Non-Government Organization that strongly advocates the important role of the Social Workers for our client which is different from the role shown in your show.

We are hoping for your response in this matter!!!

NGO Social Workers--121.1.11.162 (talk) 02:52, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

It's possible your comment will be seen by the show's producers, but the page is owned by Wikipedia, not them. It's quite possible they aren't even aware this discussion page exists. Regards, Piano non troppo (talk) 18:32, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

at IP address 124.106.168.40

• You have been recently causing an edit war with a bot. Please be reminded by the following for the page:

• XLinkBlot is not a user but a bot. It automatically sees you edits and reverts it, if ever it is unnecessary.
• Please stop inserting the multiply link as the show's official website because it is not. The link from the official website of ABS-CBN is, as it is made by the station for the show.
• Please also stop inserting the removed unnessecary parts of the summary. The page is now 50 kilobytes, which obviously is massive. We need to keep the memory of this page in minimal.

--Witchy2006 (talk) 12:39, 11 August 2009 (UTC)

Conflict of interests

At first you told us that ratings are unnecessary then, ratings should only be a week ratings stated by you, witchy2006. IN THIS SECTION IT CLEARLY SHOWS THAT THERE IS A LARGE TIME GAP BETWEEN THE TWO and not merely a week of ratings basis.

You accused me on my own page that I am a liar, that MBP won the rating race and not Darna, then i reedited my post to Maricel Soriano and other big stars on subsequent episodes, you are just making a story. I know that you love editing may bukas pa, but i smell conflict of interest bacause you keep on vandalizing the Darna 2009 article which in turn the rival show of this show through deleteing the critical response, trivia section and such while other articles here have them, was there a guideline for not having them? i believe i saw a critical reception in other movie articles here but you have also deleted that section.

J0-r3L (talk -- 14:31, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

• When it comes to Wikipedia, there is no rivalry going on, unless you wanted to. This will be long so I will have to make it into a list:

1) Ratings - The ratings section is needed to imply for the other Reception parts of the section such as the extension of the show for 14 weeks and the January 2010 extension. The extensions can never be explained without the rating information. Plus, the section shows both the ratings of TNS and AGB to avoid conflict, unlike you edits in Darna (2009 TV series) which only looks in system in AGB. Moreover, the ratings of the Darna page, doesn't even seem to connect in any part of the page unlike the May Bukas Pa rating section, which again I have to say, completes the summary of the Reception section.

2) Wrong informations being inserted - You insert a lot of wrong information in the page, especially in the Rival Show section. As I have already explained in your page.

• Maricel Soriano never made an appearance on the show yet.
• The episode with Dolphy did deliver "good ratings" as this link from PEP delivered by TNS, shows that Darna is only at 3rd place, May Bukas Pa at 2nd and TV Patrol World at the top. Where exactly did darna overpassed May Bukas Pa?
• You've stated "and other stars" - ONLY DOLPHY was the new special guest in the show from when Darna debuted.

3) Liar? - I never once called you a liar. I checked all of my edits and not even once I have told you that. And where exactly did I make a story? All that I have mentioned is a fact. Only a person who is guilty, would remove a cooperation message in his page. Clearly, you don't want to cooperate. And I never vandalized Darna (2009 TV series), other users have agreed with me that rating section that doesn't even have any connection from anything in the page is very unnecessary. It's a good faith edit whether you like it or not. PS again, Please stop calling edits that you don't like a "vandalism".

--Witchy2006 (talk) 15:02, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Did I even call edits that I don't like as vandalism? you are just making another story,

anyways you accused my edits as vandalism and lies right?, so it's clear that you are accusing me of liar. On the rating section, check the history if I am only one that agreed on rating section, mind you I'm not the only one who is editing on that page and I'm just reverting some sections other users created that you have deleted.

your other question were already answered, refer to the history pages of Darna and may bukas pa and to my first post.

J0-r3L (talk -- -- 15:20, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

• I would suggest that you read my reply very carefully and write your reply constructively, instead of enraging about something that would be the least thing to be worried about. Well, this will be long to, so I guess I'm gonna have to make a list again.

1) "Did I even call edits that I don't like as vandalism? you are just making another story," -- J0-r3L says.

• This, this and this. I wouldn't call it a made up story if I have evidences.

2) "anyways you accused my edits as vandalism and lies right?"-- J0-r3L says.

• Let's look at this carefully. Did I or did I not? Well, if you really read my reply, it would simply explain why your edits are wrong. I said "wrong" and not a lie. And again, I never mentioned that your edits are vandalism, I dont really have that habit.

3)"on ratings, if you want to add the other ratings by the other company why instead of editing it you opted to delete it?"-- J0-r3L says.

• Because it is unnecessary to the page. So you're telling me that if you created a "column and tabs" of the ratings of AGB, I should make one for TNS too? Wouldn't that again come to my conclusion of the page becoming a "blog".

--Witchy2006 (talk) 15:34, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

I would recommend YOU to read all my reply and include to it the History sections of Darna and May Bukas Pa. I quote, "And again, I never mentioned that your edits are vandalism, I dont really have that habit. "Here's the evidence tsk. tsk..

I called it vandalism for the fact that i discovered that you are an avid May Bukas Pa editor, as you have said on your page that happened to be already deleted that "You Love Editing May Bukas Pa" which is again I will say the rival program of Darna, mind you, you have not just deleted the Ratings section, but the viewership, the critical reception as well as the trivia section per se which is fishy. and again look for the history section for evidences. The only question remains, why bother vandalizing the article rival show of your favorite show?. J0-r3L (talk -- 16:23, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

• Sigh, when will your blabbering over this rivalry stop...

1) Darna Editing: Yes, I did edit Darna, and what exactly is wrong with that? Ever wonder why they call this the "Free Encyclopedia"? I didn't vandalize anything in that page, all I did was make the page pass the guidelines and make it less look like a blog. Plus, I live in London, we don't even have GMA Pinoy TV here, all we have is TFCko, so how would I exactly get involved in networks wars? What I editted in the page is not the storyline or any other stuff that would involve in the show.My only argument is the biased rating involved and the unnecessary informations being inserted. Now tell me, What's the connection of all of those in network warring?....I guess I can tsk..tsk...more than you do.

2) Vandalism: Yes, I did accuse you for vandalism but just for once - so I'm guessing you didn't exactly know the definition of "habit".

3) May Bukas Pa: Now answer this one. Why exactly go to May Bukas Pa and remove contents in the page? Even though you have been given a very valid reason why not to. I know this will open to the Darna page again, but then there isn't really any arguement that lets the Ratings remain in that page while in May Bukas Pa there is one.

Wait a minute, did you just vandalize my userpage? And what's with the name calling and the sarcastic tone? Do you think using CAPS LOCKS will make me feel afraid of you? And are you telling me that I'm not allowed to edit other articles other than May Bukas Pa, why, are you the owner of Wikipedia? Oh wait, another vandaliswm accusation in that one...sigh...--Witchy2006 (talk) 17:03, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

J0-r3L, mad over Darna (2009 TV series)'s protection

• If you're mad about Darna's protection, don't spread the anger over here. The Darna page had already been having Edit wars since GMA Fan and ISWAK, it is only necessary for the administrators to protect it. Revenge will never bring you anywhere honey. Remember, this is a show about Jesus and his miracles and good works through Santino. It will be your own fault if God gives you bad karma. --Witchy2006 (talk) 17:08, 16 August 2009 (UTC)

Updates?

When will someone update the storyline?? Gloria Romero's turn has already finished, it's already Pen Medina's time, and sooner or later it's gonna be Krista Ranillo's.

Where are our editors?!!!

And please stop this useless bickering over the show's ratings and of the other network! Please confine your bullshit of a fight at a place not covered by Wikipedia, or I'll request for protection over this article due to incessant bickering of 2 immature editors. Heran et Sang'gres (talk) 11:33, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

• I fixed it. Apparently, its actually Sam Milby's time now. The update must've been taken so long since the storyline is going pretty slow, they didnt have any guesting for over a month after Mickey Ferriols guested before.--CocaCirca2009 (talk) 20:21, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Re-run

Last night, after re-airing MMK's episode "Lubid", they showned the short teaser trailer of May Bukas Pa that will re-run starting on May 22, 2011. Sorry for my english.Rouward (talk) 03:08, 22 April 2011 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on May Bukas Pa. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090316040340/http://inbetweentakes.com/2009/01/28/ang-abandonado/ to http://inbetweentakes.com/2009/01/28/ang-abandonado/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090322013242/http://www.sunstar.com.ph/manila/%E2%80%98may-bukas-pa%E2%80%99-remains-top to http://www.sunstar.com.ph/manila/%E2%80%98may-bukas-pa%E2%80%99-remains-top
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090320040119/http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/entertainment/entertainment/view/20090316-194515/May-Bukas-Pa-plus-and-minus to http://showbizandstyle.inquirer.net/entertainment/entertainment/view/20090316-194515/May-Bukas-Pa-plus-and-minus
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20121017125820/http://telebisyon.net/balita/Cristine-Reyes-attends-Seoul-International-Drama-Awards-Eva-Fonda-wins-Special-Prize/artikulo/73679/ to http://telebisyon.net/balita/Cristine-Reyes-attends-Seoul-International-Drama-Awards-Eva-Fonda-wins-Special-Prize/artikulo/73679/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:04, 23 January 2018 (UTC)