This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
![]() | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Criticism of DRC piece
editPinging 207.237.145.249 to invite discussion of how to properly represent the (reliably sourced) criticism of the DRC piece, per WP:BRD. Innisfree987 (talk) 23:12, 12 September 2017 (UTC)
/* Criticism of DRC piece */ Attiah's piece is extremely unfair -- she mischaracterizes Jasanoff's points. Jasanoff doesn't call Africa a country (as Attiah alleges in the video); she doesn't approve of King Leopold (as Attiah claims in the video). To compare a serious scholar to Louise Linton is absurd.
By citing this critique without including the rebuttal (The Hindu review offers one -- explaining why Conrad's work should still matter), the wikipedia page parrots a very biased point of view. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:30A:C085:62F0:40FB:1C3:B3E2:2F (talk) 22:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)
Bibliography
editI have commenced a tidy-up of the Bibliography section using cite templates. Capitalization and punctuation follow standard cataloguing rules in AACR2 and RDA, as much as Wikipedia templates allow it. ISBNs and other persistent identifiers, where available, are commented out, but still available for reference. This is a work in progress; feel free to continue. Sunwin1960 (talk) 07:21, 22 June 2018 (UTC)