Talk:Maya civilization/GA1
Latest comment: 9 years ago by Zanhe in topic GA Review
GA Review
editGA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Zanhe (talk · contribs) 20:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this article. It looks very well written and I'm familiar with some of the main author's past work. It'll probably take me a few days to read the article and some of the numerous cited sources. -Zanhe (talk) 20:30, 28 April 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- The prose is clear and concise, and well written. Spotchecked against a few sources available online, and no copyvio found. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Lead, layout, formatting are in compliance. Not related to fiction or lists. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Yes. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- B. Citations to reliable sources, where necessary:
- Reliable sources cited throughout. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- C. No original research:
- All conclusions or opinions are supported with reliable neutral sources. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Yes. I can't think of any important aspect that the article does not cover. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- B. Focused:
- Article is long because of the complex nature of the subject covered. It is focused and does not contain excessive details. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Neutrally written in dispassionate tone. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- No edit wars. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status:
- All images are on Commons, either Public Domain or tagged with a free license. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Good use of images and maps. All have appropriate captions. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail: It took me hours to read the article and some of the cited sources. But once that's done, it's really a no-brainer to pass the article. In fact, the article is of a higher quality than many FA's I've seen. Kudos to Simon Burchell for the hard work he's done to bring the article on this important and fascinating subject to such a high standard. -Zanhe (talk) 19:25, 13 May 2015 (UTC)