Talk:Maynard Nexsen

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Lindenfall in topic Merger proposed

Contested deletion

edit

This is a non-biased write up of a large private company. The firm is mentioned in several other places throughout Wikipedia and has several notable attorneys that have their own Wikipedia page.

Notability is not inherited from the employees for the company (follow the link to find out more about this crucial topic). My recommendation would be that you try to provide cites from arm's-length third-party sources of expert opinion that specifically deal with the merits of the organization per se. All Wikipedia articles must be bolstered with reliable sources that testify to the notability of the topic in a verifiable way. If you have questions, feel free to leave me a note by clicking on the green "U" after my signature. Ubelowme U Me 17:11, 16 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
I've removed the speedy and slapped two quick cites into it, to give the author some time.--Milowenthasspoken 21:42, 16 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Maynard, Cooper & Gale, P.C.. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:22, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Merger proposed

edit
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
The result of this discussion was: merge Lindenfall (talk) 18:23, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Request received to merge articles: Nexsen Pruet into Maynard, Cooper & Gale; June 2023. Rationale: Combines two stub articles of two recently merged companies. Following the page merge, the new page would be renamed (moved) to the new firm name: Maynard Nexsen, retaining the history of the two predecessor firms in one article. Please discuss here. Lindenfall (talk) 19:19, 11 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

This seems correct. The firms have merged, the resulting article shouldn’t be too lengthy, and readers are not likely to be confused by the redirect. Nihil obstat. — ob C. alias ALAROB 13:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)Reply
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.