Talk:Mayoralty of Dennis Kucinich
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mayoralty of Dennis Kucinich article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Canceling the sale of Municipal Light
editThis section is ridiculous. It portrays Dennis Kucinich as the superhero of Cleveland who saved the day. Please, this is absurdly biased. Cite some sources for this nonsense or it's going to be deleted. -- LightSpectra (talk) 01:43, 10 September 2008 (UTC)
Maybe because he was he saved are city almost 200million dollars in one term. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.140.130.69 (talk) 20:20, 22 June 2009 (UTC)
Image copyright problem with Image:Forbes-kucinich.jpg
edit
The image Image:Forbes-kucinich.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check
- That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
- That this article is linked to from the image description page.
This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:25, 11 September 2008 (UTC)
removing POV tag with no active discussion per Template:POV
editI've removed an old neutrality tag from this page that appears to have no active discussion per the instructions at Template:POV:
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
- There is consensus on the talkpage or the NPOV Noticeboard that the issue has been resolved
- It is not clear what the neutrality issue is, and no satisfactory explanation has been given
- In the absence of any discussion, or if the discussion has become dormant.
- This template is not meant to be a permanent resident on any article. Remove this template whenever:
Since there's no evidence of ongoing discussion, I'm removing the tag for now. If discussion is continuing and I've failed to see it, however, please feel free to restore the template and continue to address the issues. Thanks to everybody working on this one! -- Khazar2 (talk) 23:36, 21 June 2013 (UTC)