Talk:McDonnell Douglas

Latest comment: 1 month ago by Fnlayson in topic Passage that doesnt make sense

Failure/Merge Details?

edit

This article has almost no information about the causes of MD's failure/merger into Boeing. Skrelk (talk) 21:31, 30 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

SkyLab Air Lock

edit

McDonnell Douglas did not build Sky Lab. They built the air lock that joined the Apolla capsule and the actual space station. I feel the list of products should be changed to reflect this fact. For documentation of this, I present my Father who helped to build the Air Lock and who's signature is on the Mock Up currently on display in the Smithstonian. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Devildave (talkcontribs) 19:08, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Who would you list as the manufacturer then? McDonnell Douglas was the main contractor and did the conversion work on the stages. -Fnlayson (talk) 19:42, 31 March 2011 (UTC)Reply

Background vs. History

edit

It seems like these two sections are the same kind of information in this article. Why not just merge them and use one heading instead of two? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.193.126.80 (talk) 02:36, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

Background covers McDonnell Douglas' pre-history before it was formed in 1967. Whichever way the sections are done, this part still needs to be labeled background or something very similar. -Fnlayson (talk) 03:55, 30 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
I agree with user Fnlayson!.--Bolzanobozen (talk) 14:04, 28 August 2017 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on McDonnell Douglas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 02:17, 30 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on McDonnell Douglas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:59, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on McDonnell Douglas. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

MD-17

edit

On this page I've discovered McDonnell Douglas published two images for the freighter MD-17, who know about that? -- Great Brightstar (talk) 19:13, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

This was a proposed commercial version of the C-17. See Boeing C-17 Globemaster III#Variants. -Fnlayson (talk) 20:15, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Do you know where this photo was taken from? I saw there was another McDonnell Douglas facility in the back. -- Great Brightstar (talk) 03:27, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

This is St. Louis surely? Both because of this pic but also logically? Mark83 (talk) 06:52, 12 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
Some resources on the Internet pointed out this facility was located at Missouri, so it's clear there was another McDonnell Douglas plant at St. Louis.
-- Great Brightstar (talk) 15:12, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

DC 10 history of problems?

edit

I am curious why there is absolutely nothing about the problems with the DC 10 that lead to two of the worst air disasters in history. Seems there is a period from about 1971-1977 that is entirely ignored. Rather important bit of history for that company, right? 121.98.228.243 (talk) 14:12, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Passage that doesnt make sense

edit

> At its peak in mid-1990, McDonnell Douglas employed 132,500 people, but dropped to about 87,400 by the end of 1992

So, the number drops, but by a date that is before the previous mark? This needs work. Vrrtigo (talk) 19:22, 18 September 2024 (UTC)Reply