This article is within the scope of WikiProject Montreal, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Montreal on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MontrealWikipedia:WikiProject MontrealTemplate:WikiProject MontrealMontreal articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hospitals, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hospitals on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HospitalsWikipedia:WikiProject HospitalsTemplate:WikiProject HospitalsHospital articles
Latest comment: 3 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
While there is some truth to the recently added sections, I think there is too much emphasis on controversies surrounding the super-hospital. I believe that it would be best to trim these back a bit, and to of course add more references. The lack of balance is particularly apparent in the "Weak public support and lack of public consultation" section. Surely there are also some who support the construction of the hospital? --MTLskyline (talk) 04:56, 21 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
The bureaucrats liked it. There was a lot of outcry about the whole project from even before they shut down other hospitals before they even began to dig. The building itself faced major criticism for poor planning and was called an eyesore by many. The staff is great but they are limited by a poorly planned physical facility. If anything the controversies section is light. Jeffery Thomas02:10, 11 May 2021 (UTC)Reply
