| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Medeco article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a photograph be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Virginia may be able to help! The external tool WordPress Openverse may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Cracking Section?
editWhy does the section on cracking the locks keep getting deleted? I mean, admittedly the citation is from Wired magazine, which makes it a little dubious, but perhaps some discussion first before removing relevant material? Lauciusa (talk) 19:40, 11 December 2008 (UTC)
Cracking Section
editI brought back the cracking section because it a valid point that has been pointed out several times. Are more references needed for it? Chotchki (talk) 19:28, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
I brought this back again, seems its the same Aqrq1 user who keeps removing it, curious this is his only page of revisions too. I added some additional documentation also including the technical presentation of some of the tools.
Kevinm3030 —Preceding undated comment added 18:47, 12 July 2009 (UTC).
The user is still reverting the cracking section even though it does not talk about exact methods more about the various facts of how the lock has been compromised. User seems to be more trying to hide it then provide a good article. Kevinm3030 (talk) 02:36, 8 August 2009 (UTC)