Talk:MediaDefender

Revision3

I think in light of Jim Louderback's claim of MD attacking Rev3[1], someone should create a rev3 section on the site.

The controversy is still unfolding. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dextr0us (talk • contribs) 16:57, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

Yes, and it looks to be quite grave, especially considering the previous scandals that mire MediaDefender. --24.91.98.99 (talk) 02:49, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Another source for the incident: Dailytech article —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.233.91.166 (talk) 20:04, 31 May 2008 (UTC)

Rev3

Something has to be done about this. Although this is not wikinews. This shoudln't disentagrate into bashing mediadefender which is obviously seems justified considering mos computer users hate this company. But this is wikipedia. Standards must be upheld. Thus this article should remain information and when there is reliable info about rev3 (might be some time) than it can be added. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Aceofspades1217 (talk • contribs) 04:55, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Viide

I am thinking that since Viide another MediaDefender project that we should link up the name to MediaDefender or at least make a stub about this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by N@vi (talk • contribs) 22:00, 29 May 2008 (UTC)

-I agree... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 141.197.12.183 (talk) 17:03, 30 May 2008 (UTC)

Level of technology

Is there no reliable source into their level of technology for infiltrating a BT network. I mean it is abundantly obvious that this whole operation is a failure, but are any of the tools released effective at negatively affecting say a BT network? EvanCarroll (talk) 16:05, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

Sources

I have reverted some of User:Wikispan's edits. While I agree that the dslreports.com page is perhaps not the most reliable source, it isn't used as such in the article, only linked in the external links section. The Torrentfreak articles on the other hand definitely fulfill the criterion for reliable sources in WP:RS: "widespread citation without comment for facts is evidence of a source's reputation and reliability for similar facts". Wired even explicitly acknowledged the quality of Torrentfreak's coverage of MediaDefender [2]. Regards, HaeB (talk) 01:51, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Utah Orin Hatch

Senator takes aim (Hatch wants computer dead), __USA Today__ http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/tech/news/techpolicy/2003-06-18-hatch-wants-computers-dead_x.htm

Sen. Orrin Hatch Calls Pirate Bay Case a Win, Slams Canada Over Copyright Issues, __Game Politics__, (June 11, 2009) http://www.gamepolitics.com/2009/06/11/sen-orrin-hatch-calls-pirate-bay-case-win-slams-canada-over-copyright-issues#.VKhNknt4WrM Wikia6969 (talk) 20:55, 3 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on MediaDefender. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071123102516/http://www.irconnect.com/mc/irc/secfilings.mc?cmd=disp&id=5543752&type=HTML to http://www.irconnect.com/mc/irc/secfilings.mc?cmd=disp&id=5543752&type=HTML
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071016195004/http://www.scmagazineus.com/Stolen-emails-reveal-anti-piracy-companys-honeypot-strategy/article/35701/ to http://www.scmagazineus.com/Stolen-emails-reveal-anti-piracy-companys-honeypot-strategy/article/35701/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071016200639/http://mediadefender-defenders.com/msg03754.html to http://www.mediadefender-defenders.com/msg03754.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:54, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on MediaDefender. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130721014755/http://revision3.com/blog/2008/05/29/inside-the-attack-that-crippled-revision3/ to http://revision3.com/blog/2008/05/29/inside-the-attack-that-crippled-revision3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:13, 24 January 2018 (UTC)