Talk:Media freedom in Russia
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Media freedom in Russia article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1, 2Auto-archiving period: 6 months  |
 | This page is not a forum for general discussion about Media freedom in Russia. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Media freedom in Russia at the Reference desk. |
| The subject of this article is controversial and content may be in dispute. When updating the article, be bold, but not reckless. Feel free to try to improve the article, but don't take it personally if your changes are reversed; instead, come here to the talk page to discuss them. Content must be written from a neutral point of view. Include citations when adding content and consider tagging or removing unsourced information. |
 | Please stay calm and civil while commenting or presenting evidence, and do not make personal attacks. Be patient when approaching solutions to any issues. If consensus is not reached, other solutions exist to draw attention and ensure that more editors mediate or comment on the dispute. |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | This article was created or improved as a part of Wiki4MediaFreedom. Building on a previous Wiki GLAM initiative, Wiki4MediaFreedom aims at boosting the availability of accurate knowledge on media freedom and pluralism in Europe on Wikipedia. |
|
||
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 180 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
NPOV
editCheck this article for objectivity. Remove links to western propaganda and to pseudo-independent organisations. Links should point to authoritative independent sources and show all views with no cuts. Links should represent official position of russian government, and view of all russian and international media, including asian countries. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 5.167.168.10 (talk) 05:48, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Are reptilians still shit in your pants, not allowing to talk about UFOs?
Despite having been asked four years back, the telling points made in this NPOV comment are yet to be addressed. Or would to do so risk highlighting how this article breaks Wikipedia's rules on balanced reporting and the need to avoid pushing an agenda? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.24.196.0 (talk) 12:55, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
poetin is same person as hitler
editpoetin is a massa murder. He looks like hitler. a person like poetin does not care about people. even his own people off russia he does not care about.
poetin must be killed for the freedom off whole the world. 82.217.161.18 (talk) 13:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)
Give it is illegal, why is Wikipedia letting people use it as a platform for Hate Speech? Would this comment been allowed is if had been aimed at the US President? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2.24.196.0 (talk) 13:15, 27 November 2023 (UTC)
Wikipedia editor detained for violating Russian law
edit"Prominent editor of Russian Wikipedia pages detained in Belarus," Yahoo.
"Authorities in Belarus have arrested and detained ... one of the top editors of Russian Wikipedia.... Bernstein was reportedly accused of violating the "fake news" law Russia passed in early March by editing the Wikipedia article about the invasion of Ukraine. Under the new law, anybody found guilty of what the country deems as false information about the Ukraine invasion — remember, the Kremlin calls it a "special military operation" — could be imprisoned for up to 15 years." --2603:7000:2143:8500:19EE:D8B5:8A85:4329 (talk) 06:11, 14 March 2022 (UTC)
Margarita Simonyan deserves to be mentioned
editHer participations in The Evening with Vladimir Solovyov. Xx236 (talk) 10:43, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
No Freedom to Present Evidence?
editSeems that Russia does not have the freedom to put across it's Point of View within this article. Is it a case of being innocent - until proven Russian? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.190 (talk) 09:07, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
- The article speaks of facts. It does cover Kremlin's justifications for the restrictions, but the absence of media freedom is not a point of view, it's a fact. Cloud200 (talk) 12:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)
The again, while the article speaks of facts - are they not mixed in with a degree of (anti-Russian) agenda pushing? (Updated) — Preceding unsigned comment added by 95.149.166.242 (talk) 19:59, 29 November 2023 (UTC)