Talk:Media imperialism

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Amelia Albanese.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:47, 18 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled

Tabloids are lumped with legitimate news sources, that are accused of ignoring and perverting events without any proof thereof. -Julius

This page helped me very much Thanks -- Anon reader

You're welcome. -- Derek Ross

The content of this page is ironic as it states ideas/opinions as fact while at the same time saying accuracy and fairness of information that is provided is being compromised. The page states as if it were fact that freedom of information remains slim instead of offering something along the lines of critics argue that freedom of information is slim. It also condones censorship without giving any positives, thus resulting in a bias. --anonymous

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 03:44, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

bias tag

I've added a bias tag to this article. The concept of media imperialism is a complicated and controversial one, which is not properly reflected in this article. I do appreciate the inclusion of references to prominent theorists in the field, but the article is wanting both of a dispassionate breakdown of the theory as well as from lacking a neutral point of view. It could be that most people reading this article tend to agree on a pernicious consequence of growing 'multinational media conglomerates', but the article should approach the subject from a neutral point of view. As is, readers are immediately given a biased impression of the subject. I'm hoping to contribute to the article this weekend to improve things. Cuffeparade (talk) 09:58, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

Notability

Not clear that this term is in sufficiently wide use to meet GNG or be regarded as encyclopedic.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:12, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

Propose Merge to cultural imperialism

• Possible condense and merge to cultural imperialism of which this is a subtopic.E.M.Gregory (talk) 20:21, 9 May 2017 (UTC)