Talk:Medium term note

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Finance & Investment, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Finance and Investment on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Finance & InvestmentWikipedia:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentTemplate:WikiProject Finance & InvestmentFinance & Investment articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Business Low‑importance

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Some info here is bogus

Latest comment: 15 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Some of the info here seems bogus. There was some spamming in this article related to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Lifnlsdlsdnf. The explicit spam has been removed, but the article is still bad. Compare [1], which talks about SEC Rule 415, shelf registrations, and how GMAC used them. That's not a reliable source in Wikipedia terms, but it makes sense. (I realize that General Motors isn't exactly a good example of financial management this week, but they're way ahead of the spammer.) --John Nagle (talk) 01:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

This Federal Reserve Bulletin article [2] might be a good source. --John Nagle (talk) 01:19, 16 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Undid copyvio

Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Just undid these edits [3] because they were copied from [4]. --John Nagle (talk) 21:08, 15 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Adding info then

Nagle: How about you actually doing some work in improving this article instead of blocking developments...! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.173.163.2 (talk • contribs)

Add topic