Talk:Medusa (band)
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because there are many points from reliable sources and much more is evident on this page that many other bands whom have done much less than this one and are on Wikipedia without being deleted so this is a double standard. They may not have been notable before, but the added changes over the years have changed this. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.92.35 (talk) 19:52, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because the band Medusa: 1. have a music video is on its way to cross 30.000 views in less than a year since it was uploaded 2. according to what can be found on the links provided, their next album is going to be produced by Steve Albini (one of the most famous producers on the planet and the producer of "In Utero" by Nirvana) 3. are among the pioneers of a new wave of punk rock in the UK 4. This page was only up for speedy deletion because the previous version of this page was deleted but since then the group has achieved a lot more 5. they are a well known band in the UK with many fans and have been played on radio stations worldwide and appeared in countless other forms of media — Preceding unsigned comment added by MotleyCrude (talk • contribs) 20:53, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because the AFD was four years ago and many new references have been added in this time. If working with Steve Albini, the producer of Nirvana and the other activities and achievements listed do not meet Wikipedia standards then a great number of other Wikipedia pages should be removed too! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nigelstevens77 (talk • contribs) 21:02, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because it now meets critera for deserving to be on wikipedia and the person requesting it be removed is ignoring the opinions of other moderators and continually relisting it! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Colinslosthisglasses (talk • contribs) 22:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because in addition, this certainly does not "unquestionably meet(s) the speedy deletion criteria".— Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.143.92.35 (talk • contribs)
Contested deletion
editThis page should not be speedily deleted because... This is a known band. I've definitely heard of them, their music and notoriety and I'm not even involved in music --AlexeiSuleimanov (talk) 14:25, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
Sourcing problems
editThis article is a great big pile of promotional spam, substantially written by two single-purpose accounts and sourced dubiously or not at all. Every claim needs WP:RS sourcing or removal - David Gerard (talk) 12:17, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
- With no action in a week and a half, I've cut it to what's cited in halfway usable sources - David Gerard (talk) 11:33, 26 October 2021 (UTC)