Talk:Meg Baird

Comments

Regarding notability: although this article could, with much difficulty, be merged into the Espers artcile, I feel like her biographical and discographical information would not belong there and as such would get lost in such a merge. At this point I don't see notability as an issue -- on the contrary, I see the lack of content about this notable person to be the issue. So let's work on fleshing this article out a bit! Whatwillhappen (talk) 08:41, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for trying to improve the article with some references; however, the 2 references that do mention Meg are primary sources (i.e. affiliated with Meg). Thus notability has not yet been established. Try to find some reliable third-party sources. In the meantime, I'm re-adding the notability tag, and adding the {{primarysources}} tag. --AbsolutDan ^(talk) 12:14, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Understood; thanks for the feedback. I've added a number of third-party references. I feel like the Allmusic references in particular help to not only add an unaffiliated view but also add credence to her general notability. With Bert Jansch as the most "notable" of other artists mentioned on the page, I think the reference that shows they did in fact tour together is also important. I will continue working on adding more information and sources. At this point I see no reason why notability should be contested. I could reference reviews of her albums by leading media outlets such as Pitchfork etc, but I feel like those would be better left for specific album articles, if they ever come to being. I suppose what I'm trying to get at is that, once again, the notability is there: the content, however, is still thin. I created this article with the aim of getting the ball rolling - it is still very young and hopefully other contribute soon. I don't think this alone is a reason to reject notability. Whatwillhappen (talk) 09:38, 15 April 2009 (UTC)

Major revision

I completed an overhaul of the page today, as the Lead was far too long for an article of this size and the page does not follow other similar pages on Wikipedia. I have also update templates and tags, as much of the content remains unverified. I will try to look at this page over the next week, but thought it best to provide an update for other copyeditors. Thanks,--Soulparadox (talk) 07:39, 19 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Meg Baird. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://www.dragcity.com/press/pimages/pdf/dc340bio.pdf
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060822214704/http://www.bertjansch.com/news.html to http://www.bertjansch.com/news.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120321091451/http://www.gimmebadvibes.com/index.php?%2Ftctd%2Finterviews%2Fmeg_baird_answers_the_questions_of_doom%2F to http://www.gimmebadvibes.com/index.php?%2Ftctd%2Finterviews%2Fmeg_baird_answers_the_questions_of_doom%2F

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:22, 24 January 2018 (UTC)