Talk:Mega Man X5/GA1
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Kung Fu Man in topic GA Review
GA Review
edit| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Kung Fu Man (talk · contribs) 02:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)
GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a. (reference section):
- The article has a proper References section. --Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- b. (citations to reliable sources):
- All sources cited are recognized as either reliable sources or situational sources cited in the appropriate manner.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- c. (OR):
- Spotcheck was performed, no original research was done or statements not supported by the checked sources. More specifically on sources [18], which does discuss the basis for the navigator's personality, [26] and [27] which do discuss the localization issues regarding naming, and in Reception [40] and [42], where the statements cited do match what's being said in their respective reviews.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
- No copyright violations done. The majority of the article is original writing and quotes applied as needed.--Kung Fu Man (talk) 20:22, 17 May 2023 (UTC)
- a. (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a. (major aspects):
- b. (focused):
- a. (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/fail:
- Pass/fail:
(Criteria marked 
are unassessed)
Congrats! You addressed any issues I brought up quickly and overall the article is in a really good and informative state. Well done!--Kung Fu Man (talk) 02:22, 13 May 2023 (UTC)